Add To Cart



Section 4
Interjurisdictional Practice of Telepsychology
“Minimum Contacts” Analysis for States Jurisdiction
over Out-Of-State Practitioners

Question 4 | Test | Table of Contents
The content below is not available in digital format.
To increase text size, maximize window then click Ctrl +
This content is intended for
Social Workers, Couneslors, MFT's, and Psychologists

Interjurisdictional Practice of Telepsychology

section4TMECreference

Update
Barriers and Facilitators to Psychologists'
Telepsychology Uptake during the Beginning
of the COVID-19 Pandemic

- Watson, J. D., Pierce, B. S., Tyler, C. M., Donovan, E. K., Merced, K., Mallon, M., Autler, A., & Perrin, P. B. (2023). Barriers and Facilitators to Psychologists' Telepsychology Uptake during the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic. International journal of environmental research and public health, 20(8), 5467.


Peer-Reviewed Journal Article References:
Barnett, J. E., & Kolmes, K. (2016). The practice of tele-mental health: Ethical, legal, and clinical issues for practitioners. Practice Innovations, 1(1), 53–66.

Martin, J. N., Millán, F., & Campbell, L. F. (2020). Telepsychology practice: Primer and first steps. Practice Innovations, 5(2), 114–127.

Murphy, J. M., & Pomerantz, A. M. (2016). Informed consent: An adaptable question format for telepsychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 47(5), 330–339.

QUESTION 4
There is currently no legal mechanism that would permit a psychologist to engage in tele-practice in another state where he or she is not licensed (other than the temporary practice statutes). What is the legal stance on Psychologists engaging in interstate tele-practice? To select and enter your answer go to Test.

Test
Section 5
Table of Contents
Top