Add To Cart



Section 4
Interjurisdictional Practice of Telepsychology
“Minimum Contacts” Analysis for States Jurisdiction
over Out-Of-State Practitioners

Question 4 | Test | Table of Contents
The content below is not available in digital format.
To increase text size, maximize window then click Ctrl +
This content is intended for
Social Workers, Counselors, MFT's, and Psychologists

Interjurisdictional Practice of Telepsychology

section4TMECreference
Peer-Reviewed Journal Article References:
Boydstun, C. D., Pandita, S., Finkelstein-Fox, L., & Difede, J. (2021). Harnessing virtual reality for disaster mental health: A systematic review. Translational Issues in Psychological Science.

Buckman, L. R., Nordal, K. C., & DeMers, S. T. (2018). Regulatory and licensure issues derived from the summit on master’s training in psychological practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 49(5-6), 321–326.

Barnett, J. E., & Kolmes, K. (2016). The practice of tele-mental health: Ethical, legal, and clinical issues for practitioners. Practice Innovations, 1(1), 53–66.

Martin, J. N., Millán, F., & Campbell, L. F. (2020). Telepsychology practice: Primer and first steps. Practice Innovations, 5(2), 114–127.

Murphy, J. M., & Pomerantz, A. M. (2016). Informed consent: An adaptable question format for telepsychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 47(5), 330–339.

QUESTION 4
What is the legal stance on Psychologists engaging in tele-practice in states where they are not licensed? To select and enter your answer go to Test.

Test
Section 5
Table of Contents
Top