|  Healthcare Training Institute - Quality Education since 1979CE for Psychologist, Social Worker, Counselor, & MFT!!
 Section 13 Overcoming Supervisor-Employee Relationship Conflicts
 |  |  Read content below or listen to audio. Left click audio track to Listen;  Right click  to "Save..." mp3
 In the last section, we discussed methods to help improve 
  your supervisee's therapist-client relationships by making sure you are on the 
  same page with your supervisee regarding such session basics as preparation; beginning; 
  exploration; and creating contracts; or whatever system you deem appropriate in 
  your practice. In this section, we will examine ways to evaluate 
  and identify problems in the supervisor-therapist relationship and in the therapist-client 
  relationship: identifying avoidance of conflict; and the "Interview Session 
  Checklist." Karl met his supervisee Beth for a bi-weekly 
  supervision meeting. Lately, Karl had noticed that, although Beth had more than 
  competent skills in empathy, she was lacking in evaluation. However, when they 
  met for their supervision meetings, Karl, the supervisor, only emphasized the 
  good aspects of the Beth's tactics such as her empathy and glossed over her lack 
  of evaluation skills. If you recall in section 4, due to a dual relationship with 
  the supervisee, the supervisor did not enhance his supervisee's skills and gave 
  him an inflated recommendation.  Karl wished to avoid any conflict and used a tactic 
  known as "smoothing over" which we will discuss later in the section. 
  As a result, Beth's evaluation and assessment skills did not improve as they could 
  have. When the time came for her annual evaluation, Beth was surprised to see 
  that her supervisor had given her a negative rating. Beth became resentful and filed a complaint against Karl, stating that he had never addressed her lack of 
  competence in client assessment until now. At the hearing, the licensure board 
  decided in favor of Beth. Had Karl confronted Beth with the problems she needed 
  to improve, she may have improved her evaluation skills.  So 
  if you feel you have conflict avoidance, here is a conflict avoidance tactic for 
  you. 
 ♦ Technique: Conflict Avoidance Tactics
 I feel one of the most destructive 
  aspects of conflict in a supervisor-supervisee relationship is avoidance of conflict. 
  Often, this avoidance arises out of a desire not to hurt the interaction or even 
  out of intimidation from the supervisee towards the supervisor. The lack of conflict 
  management skills and the avoidance of confrontation... Can you see how they are 
  a chicken-egg situation? Here's what I mean by a chicken-egg situation. If you 
  avoid the conflict, you can't develop your conflict management skills, however, 
  you may be avoiding the conflict due to your lack of conflict management skills.
 10 Favorite Supervisor Excuses Some of the most favored excuses I have heard for supervisors not addressing an 
  issue include the following:
 1. Importance. Have you ever thought that the 
  issue was not important enough to discuss?
 2. Time Constraints. Did you ever 
  use the excuse that there was not enough time to sufficiently cover the entire 
  issue?
 3. Avoiding being "anal." Did you ever wish to appear rational 
  over appearing "nit-picky"?
 4. Waiting it out. Did you ever hope 
  that "Time will take care of it"?
 5. Gunnysacking. Have you ever 
  been guilty of "Gunnysacking"? This means to pile up grievances as if 
  in a gunnysack and carrying the sack slung around your shoulder.
 6. Smoothing 
    over. Do you gloss over any conflict that might arise and emphasize the strong 
  areas?
 7. Small sighted. Do you focus on the details to avoid addressing the 
  big issues?
 8. Being PC. Do you avoid conflict out of politeness?
 9. Impartiality. Did you ever think that confrontation will hurt your objectivity towards your 
  supervisee?
 10. Aggressiveness. Do you instead attack your supervisee?
 
 There 
  are many more, and I might encourage you to add to your list of avoidance tactics. 
  Karen, a supervisee at a clinical facility, had absentee problems and would skip 
  her sessions especially for her evening group. Thus, another staff member had 
  to take over the group, not to mention the lack of continuity and confusion experienced 
  by the group by continually having different co-leaders.
 However, her supervisor, 
  Roberta, hoped that Karen would "grow out of her problem" and wanted 
  to "wait it out" and see if Karen's behavior improved over time. Roberta 
  was exhibiting the conflict avoidance tactic of "waiting it out." Do 
  you ever display any of these characteristics?
 ♦  Technique:  Interview Session 
    Checklist
 In evaluating the therapist-client relationship of your supervisee, 
  I have found a specific method most reliable, because sometimes they do forget 
  the basics. Recall the previous section in which we discussed facilitating therapist 
  client relationships. For each specific stage I mentioned, I comprised an "Interview 
  Session Checklist" that can easily help me identify the weaknesses and strengths 
  of my supervisee's interviewing skills.
 
 One of my supervisees was strong in her 
  preparatory stage, which was outlined in the previous section, but was not sufficient 
  in her exploration stage. The checklist I used for the exploration stage included 
  the following. The score I used for the evaluation will be read at the end of 
  the statement. A one indicates that I strongly disagreed, a two that I disagreed, 
  a three that I agreed, and a four that I strongly agreed.
 
 7-Point Checklist for the Exploration Stage
 # 1. Supervisee can 
  effectively use the skill of asking questions (3).
 # 2. Supervisee can effectively 
  use the skill of seeking clarification (3).
 # 3. Supervisee can effectively use 
  the skill of reflecting content (2).
 # 4. Supervisee can effectively use the 
  skill of reflecting feelings (1).
 # 5. Supervisee can effectively use the skill 
  of reflecting feeling and meaning (1).
 # 6. Supervisee can effectively use the 
  skill of partializing (3).
 # 7. Supervisee can effectively use the skill of going 
  beyond what is said (1).
 
 As you can see, her assessment was efficient in 
  asking questions, seeking clarification, and partializing, however, she was less 
  than proficient in reflecting content, reflecting feelings, reflecting feelings 
  and meaning, and going beyond what is said. I addressed these issues in our weekly 
  supervision session and gave her practice formats to use during a session.
 To 
  improve her skill of reflecting feelings and meanings, I suggested that she say 
  "You feel _____and_____"; and "You feel _____ because _______."  However, there are no formats for going beyond what is said. I suggested that 
  she combine reflecting feelings with her own interpretations of the situation. 
  For instance, in her next session with her client, the supervisee stated, "You feel guilty because of the last words you said to your son before he died. Do 
  you sometimes feel that if you hadn't yelled at him about those dirty clothes, 
  he might somehow still be alive?"  As you can see, the supervisee successfully 
  interpreted the client's beliefs in her own situation without specific statements. In 
  this section, we discussed ways to evaluate and identify problems in the supervisor-therapist 
  relationship and in the therapist-client relationship: identifying avoidance of 
  conflict; and the "Interview Session Checklist." In 
  the next section, we will examine the basic skills in empowering your supervisee: 
  nurturing, coaching, and mentoring.Reviewed 2023
 
 Peer-Reviewed Journal Article References:
 Borelli, J. L., Sohn, L., Wang, B. A., Hong, K., DeCoste, C., & Suchman, N. E. (2019). Therapist–client language matching: Initial promise as a measure of therapist–client relationship quality. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 36(1), 9–18.
 
 Graham, K. A., Dust, S. B., & Ziegert, J. C. (2018). Supervisor-employee   power distance incompatibility, gender similarity, and relationship   conflict: A test of interpersonal interaction theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(3), 334–346.
 
 Liu, C., Yang, L.-Q., & Nauta, M. M. (2013). Examining the   mediating effect of supervisor conflict on procedural injustice–job   strain relations: The function of power distance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(1), 64–74.
 
 Mammen, M. A. (2020). Attachment dynamics in the supervisory relationship: Becoming your own good supervisor. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 30(1), 93–101.
 QUESTION 13  What are two ways to correct problems resulting in the supervisor-therapist 
    relationship and therapist-client relationship? To select and enter your answer go to .
 
 
 
 
 
 
 |