|  |  |  Healthcare Training Institute - Quality Education since 1979CE for Psychologist, Social Worker, Counselor, & MFT!!
 Section 
3Impossibility of Separation
  |  | 
 Read content below or listen to audio.
 Left click audio track to Listen;  Right click  to "Save..." mp3
 The 
previous section, provided you with a listing of six common methods abusers use to 
  control, as well as an outline for a Personal Power Exercise. 
 In this section, we 
will discuss four rationalizations that battered women use to excuse their partner's 
abusive behavior in an attempt to manage the situation. We will also outline four 
basic "If Only" Destruction Techniques to get past these rationalizing 
thoughts.
 
 The following is a list of four common "If only" rationalizations 
as to why a controller becomes abusive. See if they don't sound familiar.
 Empowerment by Analyzing 4 Common Rationalizations of Abusers 
 ♦ 1. 
    Alcohol
 The first "If only" rationalization used to manage the 
  unmanageable is the common assumption that drugs and alcohol lead to abusive behavior. 
  Kaufman and Straus found that wife battering was seven times greater among binge-drinking, 
  blue-collar men who approved of wife slapping. However, while undoubtedly drugs 
  and alcohol make abuse worse, as you know they cannot actually cause the abuse 
  to happen. Therefore Chris' "if only" rationalization that "if 
  only" the alcohol may not change the behavior.
 
 For instance, Raven, 
  a 27-year-old mother said, "I would tell my kids that their dad suffered 
  from a disease called alcoholism. But then Ted started abusing me when he was 
  sober. That blew it for me. I had to accept the fact that the alcohol was a cover, 
  and that the real issue was his and my denial of an existing problem." Does 
  Raven sound familiar to you?
 
 Interestingly enough, according to the New 
  Jersey Uniform Crime Report, a positive correlation exists between domestic 
  violence and addiction. This positive correlation between domestic violence 
  and addiction ranges from 44% to more than 80% according to some research studies. 
  Have you found this high correlation between addictions and violence to be used 
  as a tool by an abuser to facilitate his denial? "I mean, after all, I was 
  drunk. So how can I be to blame!" This denial also facilitates the batterer's 
  minimizing his problem and responsibility for his behavior.
 
 ♦  2. Dysfunctional 
    Childhood
 A second "If only" rationalization used by battered 
  women to manage their situation is that a dysfunctional, abusive childhood caused 
  the batterer to act in an abusive manner. However, it might be noted that studies 
  indicate that well over half (approximately 65-85%) of adults abused as children 
  do not grow up to abuse their children or spouse.
 
 Lauren, a 37-year-old 
  woman spent countless hours cleaning the house, cooking meals, taking care of 
  the kids, and screening Chad's phone calls from bill collectors. Lauren stated, 
  "I used to say to myself, 'Poor Chad, he never was loved by his mother. His 
  father beat him regularly and then died when he was 11. That's why Chad dumps 
  his frustrations by telling me that I am a bitch and a slut. But even though I 
  feel sorry for him, understanding of his childhood has gotten me nowhere. The 
  reality of this situation is that the more my husband continues slapping me around, 
  the more he hurts our family."
 
 As you can see, Lauren was able to see through 
  her "If Only" rationalization of Chad's dysfunctional childhood; he 
  is still responsible for his own behavior.
 
 ♦ 3. Insecurity
 In 
  addition to alcohol and dysfunctional families, a third "If only" rationalization 
  in an attempt to manage the situation of a battering partner is the batterer's 
  insecurity. Here is an example.
 
 Jenny, age 33 stated, "It took me years to 
  see who Mitch really was. He's a bottomless pit that I keep trying to fill. He 
  acts insecure in order to get attention. All the while I was soothing his ego, 
  he was beating me down with his constant yelling and slapping. Eventually I started 
  to feel dependent on Mitch, and that was what made him feel important and secure." 
  As you know, this is the beginning of the classic codependent bond. Jenny's subservience 
  to Mitch and growing insecurity became the mainstay of his security and ego.
 
 Think for a minute. What battered client are you currently treating who uses 
  the "If only" rationalization of alcoholism, dysfunctional family, or 
  insecurity as a reason for staying in the relationship? If none of these seem 
  to fit a client you are currently treating, perhaps the fourth "If only" 
  rationalization of pent up anger fits a client you are currently treating.
 
 ♦ 4. Unexpressed Anger
 The fourth "If only" rationalization 
  is pent up or unexpressed anger. As you know, pop psychology teaches people to 
  express their inner feelings. However, contrary to the popular notion that venting 
  makes people feel better, studies have shown that batterers who vent can become 
  even angrier.
 
 This therapy technique can be dangerous, if not applied correctly, 
  when used with a violent and controlling man. The batterer already believes that 
  he has the right to impose his moods on others. The result is that he feels he 
  has gained authoritative support for his explosive tirades. I have found some 
  batterers lack the level of empathy it takes to make the prescription of 
  venting of feelings a viable option. Do you agree or disagree with this idea?
 
 In one of our sessions, Laura, a 35-year-old woman, stated she was tired 
  of her husband Louis' angry tirades. "Louis used to come home and just blow 
  up at any little thing, like once he bashed me good in the jaw because he saw 
  a dust ball in the corner of the living room behind the couch."
 
 Empowerment over "If Only"Rationalizations
 With Raven, Lauren, Jenny, and Laura, I used the four basics of "If 
  only" Destruction. As I describe these "If only" Destruction Techniques, 
  think of a Raven, Lauren, Jenny, or Laura you are currently treating. Would any 
  of these four techniques be beneficial in your next session with her to assist 
  her in viewing her situation more realistically?
 
 ♦  1. To dispel Raven's 
  "If only" rationalizations, that if only Ted wouldn't drink, Raven 
  seemed to benefit from realizing when she was reacting and allowing Ted to control 
  her mood. What do you think? When Raven was saying to herself, "Ted made 
  me feel outraged" or "Ted made me feel sorry for myself", I pointed 
  out to her that she was reacting. Raven stated, "It helped me learn that 
  I needed to control my own feelings, that I could decide how long to experience 
  a certain feeling, and what I was going to do about it."
 
 ♦ 2. To dispel 
    Lauren's "If only" rationalizations of Chad's dysfunctional family 
  background, Lauren wanted to gain some distance from Chad. This is an easy step 
  I often overlook. But have you considered suggesting your battered client make 
  themselves comfortable after the blowup has occurred to gain some perspective 
  on their "If only" rationalizations? Easy to overlook, right? Lauren 
  stated, "Now I've learned that I need to 'take a break' and get some perspective 
  after something happens with Chad. I usually take a few deep breaths, go for a 
  walk, read a few pages from the Bible, or hang up some clothes in my bedroom. 
  Once I step back a little I can see how his abusive childhood really isn't what 
  is causing him to slap me."
 
 ♦ 3.  To dispel Jenny's "If only" 
    rationalizations regarding Mitch's insecurity, I suggested she consider examining 
  what happened by getting feedback from friends. Jenny stated, "After talking 
  to friends, they helped me to see that Mitch was intentionally insulting me and 
  trying to push my buttons. And that I wasn't overreacting."
 
 ♦ 4. To 
    dispel Laura's "If only" rationalization, regarding Louis' anger, 
  I suggested she might consider what she needed to do to take care of her emotional 
  needs. After several sessions, Laura stated, "There really isn't any reason 
  why I should have to make Louis see the light or set him straight, or that I should 
  have to explain his anger. I only need to do that for myself."
 
 To 
    review
the four basic "If Only" Destruction Techniques that 
  Raven, Lauren, Jenny, and Laura used to get past their rationalizing thoughts
 
  they were
:
 1. Being responsible for her feelings
 2. Gaining distance and perspective
 3. Getting feedback from supportive friends
 4. Taking care of her own emotional needs
 
 In the next section, we will discuss specific 
  interventions to assist your battered client in unraveling her feelings of guilt.
 Reviewed 2023
 
 Peer-Reviewed Journal Article References:
 Hammett, J. F., Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2020). When does verbal aggression in relationships covary with physical violence? Psychology of Violence.  .
 
 Hardesty, J. L., Ogolsky, B. G., Raffaelli, M., Whittaker, A., Crossman, K. A., Haselschwerdt, M. L., Mitchell, E. T., & Khaw, L. (2017). Coparenting relationship trajectories: Marital violence linked to change and variability after separation. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(7), 844–854.
 
 Jankowski, P. J., Sandage, S. J., Cornell, M. W., Bissonette, C., Johnson, A. J., Crabtree, S. A., & Jensen, M. L. (2018). Religious beliefs and domestic violence myths. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10(4), 386–397.
 
 Metz, C., Calmet, J., & Thevenot, A. (2019). Women subjected to domestic violence: The impossibility of separation. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 36(1), 36–43.
 
 Sullivan, C. M., & Virden, T. (2017). Interrelationships among length of stay in a domestic violence shelter, help received, and outcomes achieved.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 87(4), 434–442.
 QUESTION 
3 What are four "If only" rationalizations commonly used by 
battered women? To select and enter your answer go to  .
 
 
 
 
 
 
 |